Legal Opinion

Cencast Services, L.P. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 10, 2013No. 2012-5142, 2012-5145, 2012-5148, 2012-5143, 2012-5146, 2012-5149, 2012-5144, 2012-5147, 2012-5150, 2012-5151PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

In these consolidated tax refund cases, Cencast Services, L.P. et al. are entities that, inter alia, remit payroll and employment taxes on behalf of motion picture and television production companies. For convenience we refer to these entities in the singular as “Cencast.” Cencast appeals from a final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Claims Court”) rejecting its claims for tax refunds. We hold that the scope of Ceneast’s liability for employment taxes under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (“FUTA”) and the Federal Insurance Contribution Act (“FICA”)…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Diversified Group Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Shell Oil Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API