Legal Opinion
Ariadne Financial Services Pty. Ltd. And Memvale Pty. Ltd. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 17, 1998No. 97-5050PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States Court of Federal Claims dismissed Ariádne Financial Services’s (Ariadne’s) breach of contract action as untimely filed. See Plaintiffs in Winstar-Related Cases v. United States, 37 Fed. Cl. 174, 191 (1997). Because the trial court correctly determined that Ariadne’s claim had accrued more than six years before its filing, this court affirms.
■ I.
In the 1960s and 1970s, federal regulations placed a cap on the interest a thrift institution could pay on deposits. As long as this maximum rate remained less than the interest rate the thrifts charged on home…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Jewell M. Hart v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- John R. Sand & Gravel Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Boling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.