Legal Opinion
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 3, 1997No. 96-5128PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
In this dispute arising from the renovation of Boston’s South Station, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (“MBTA”) appeals the grants of summary judgment by the Court of Federal Claims, 1 ruling that MBTA has no entitlement to recover against the United States for any breaches of contract that may have occurred. The Court of Federal Claims held that a warranty disclaimer provision in the contract between MBTA and the Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) was superior to other remedial provisions, and shielded FRA from the consequences of breach of other…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., and Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Robert F. Christian, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- CW Government Travel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.