Legal Opinion
Shinnecock Indian Nation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 7, 2015No. 2014-5015PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
The Shinnecock Indian Nation (the “Nation”) appeals a final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing its suit for lack of jurisdiction. See Shinnecock Indian Nation v. United States, 112 Fed.Cl. 369 (2013) (“Court of Federal Claims Decision ”). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
Background
In June 2005, the Nation filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York “seek[ing] to vindicate its rights to certain lands located in the Town of Southampton in Suffolk County, New York.” Shinnecock Indian Nation v.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Balestra v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Jacobs Technology Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.