Legal Opinion
Milmark Services, Inc. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 5, 1984No. Appeal 83-1259PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Circuit Judge.
This ease is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Claims Court (White, Senior Judge) 1 holding that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) is not liable for termination of a contract with Milmark Services, Inc., following Milmark’s non-performance.
The suit was brought directly to the United States Court of Claims from the contracting officer’s decision in accordance with 41 U.S.C. § 609(a)(1) (Supp. II 1978). Under § 403(d) of the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982, Pub.L. No. 97-164, 96 Stat. 25, 58 (1982), the case was subsequently transferred…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Ssih Equipment S.A. v. United States International Trade Commission and Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Atlas Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- The Sharman Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Contreras v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.