Legal Opinion
Franconia Associates v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 10, 2002No. 01-455PublishedCited by 264 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg
The two cases consolidated for our review concern the timeliness of claims filed against the United States under the Tucker Act, 28 U. S. C. § 1491. Petitioners are property owners who participated in a federal program to promote development of affordable rental housing in areas not traditionally served by conventional lenders. In exchange for low-interest mortgage loans issued by the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA), petitioners agreed to devote their properties to low- and middle-income housing and to abide by related restrictions during the life of the loans.
Petitioners allege that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by264 opinions
- Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Jackson v. KotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
259 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.