Legal Opinion
Cryer v. Cryer
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 2011No. B222906PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1043Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
Jon Cryer and Sarah Trigger Cryer were married and had a son (hereinafter, child). They eventually separated and divorced. Following their separation, Sarah had primary physical custody of child and received substantial child support. After a dependency action was initiated, however, child was placed with Jon. While the dependency action was still in the early procedural stages, Jon sought to modify his child support obligation. The family court modified the child support amount but did not decrease it as much as Jon requested.
On appeal, we find that the family court did…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re Nolan W.California Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Marriage of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Marriage of PopenhagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Goldring v. GoldringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Morton v. Morton (In re Morton), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sharples v. SharplesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Freitas v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Barth v. BarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- S.P. v. F.G.California Court of Appeal · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.