Legal Opinion

Cheriton v. Fraser

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 2001No. H019424PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WUNDERLICH, J.

This is a marital dissolution action. At issue on appeal are child support, spousal support, and attorneys’ fees. Because the trial court erred in setting support and in denying fees, we reverse and remand.

*280Facts and Procedural History

Appellant Iris M. Fraser (Iris) and respondent David R. Cheriton (David) were married in February 1980.1 They have four children, all bom between 1980 and 1988.

Ms performs and teaches music. David is a professor of computer science at Stanford University. David is also a researcher and an inventor. In addition, he works as a consultant to…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Commissioner v. LoBueSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re Marriage of EpsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. GipsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. People v. BautistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Cryer v. CryerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API