Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Popenhager
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1979No. Civ. 44247PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
.Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
The wife appeals from an order 1 which retroactively modified a prior divorce decree child support provision to correspond to the child support provisions arising out of a subsequent enforcement suit brought by the wife pursuant to former Code of Civil Procedure section 1689, a part of the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act of 1968 2 (RURESA). The wife contends that: 1) the trial court erred as a RURESA order could not act to supersede the prior divorce decree support order; 2) interest on the support arrearages was required; and 3) the trial court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Worthley v. WorthleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re Marriage of MulhernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- In Re Marriage of JanssenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Whittlesey v. BellahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Donald v. Cafe Royale, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- French v. Prante (In Re French)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1981
- In Re Marriage of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Valdez v. ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.