Legal Opinion

Sharples v. Sharples

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 2014No. E056941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this marriage dissolution proceeding, appellant Linda Sharpies (Wife) sought an order requiring respondent Norman Sharpies (Husband) to pay for her attorney fees and costs pendente lite. The court denied the request because Wife did not file Judicial Council form FL-319 (hereafter form FL-319), which the court explained was mandatory. Because that form is not mandatory when, as here, comparable declarations are submitted, we will reverse the court’s order.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

Wife filed an order to show cause (OSC) seeking modification of spousal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Falcone v. FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Caverly v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Cryer v. CryerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morton v. Morton (In re Morton), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Faton v. Ahmedo CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Martin v. Martin (In re Martin), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Applied Medical Distribution Corp. v. JarrellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Faton v. AhmedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API