Legal Opinion
In Re Nolan W.
California Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 2009No. S159524PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
In an effort to address the intractable problem of parental drug abuse in juvenile dependency cases, the San Diego County Superior Court implemented an aggressive treatment program known as the Substance Abuse Recovery Management System (SARMS). A parent who is believed to have “alcohol and/or drug issues” will be assessed and, if necessary, ordered to participate in SARMS as part of a family reunification case plan. (Super. Ct. San Diego County, Local Rules, rule 6.1.19; hereafter Rule 6.1.19.) The San Diego court enforces parental compliance with SARMS using not just the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Vincent De Frontbrune v. Alan WofsyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. C.B.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cryer v. CryerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. M.J.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Orange County Social Services Agency v. Debra T.California Court of Appeal · 2011
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.