Legal Opinion

Barth v. Barth

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 2012No. G045142PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, Acting P. J.

If ever there was a case where the adage “be careful what you wish for”1 applied, this is surely it. Appellant Jeffrey Barth spent years resisting Andrea Barth’s2 attempt to litigate their divorce and child custody issues in Ohio, going as far as appealing to the Ohio Supreme Court. That court agreed with Jeffrey and concluded the Ohio courts lacked jurisdiction because Andrea had not lived in Ohio for six months immediately prior to filing her divorce action. (Barth v. Barth (2007) 113 Ohio St. 3d 27 [2007 Ohio 973, 862 N.E.2d 496, 498].) Jeffrey finally achieved…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. County of Santa Clara v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cryer v. CryerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. County of L.A. Child Support Services Dept. v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  2. Marriage of Murphy CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Samuelian v. Life Generations Healthcare, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. Samuelian v. Life Generations Healthcare, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Speier v. Superior Court CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API