State ex rel. Multimedia, Inc. v. Whalen
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In State, ex rel. Natl. Broadcasting Co., v. Cleveland (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 79, 526 N.E. 2d 786, we held that in an open records case the respondent had the burden of proving that public records are excepted from disclosure. We find that respondent has not sustained this burden of proof and grant the writ.
Respondent raises multiple defenses in his answer, but briefs only two of them: executive privilege and adequate remedy at law. We consider only these two.
Respondent argues that since an investigation of this incident is ongoing, executive privilege permits him not to disclose the records.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Henneman v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Barton v. ShupeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by25 opinions
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. James v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. University of Toledo FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.