Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Multimedia, Inc. v. Whalen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1990No. 89-1757PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

In State, ex rel. Natl. Broadcasting Co., v. Cleveland (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 79, 526 N.E. 2d 786, we held that in an open records case the respondent had the burden of proving that public records are excepted from disclosure. We find that respondent has not sustained this burden of proof and grant the writ.

Respondent raises multiple defenses in his answer, but briefs only two of them: executive privilege and adequate remedy at law. We consider only these two.

Respondent argues that since an investigation of this incident is ongoing, executive privilege permits him not to disclose the records.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Henneman v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Barton v. ShupeOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. James v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. University of Toledo FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API