Legal Opinion
Barton v. Shupe
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 1988No. 87-1900PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Per curiam
In his motion for summary judgment, respondent argues that the report sought is a trial preparation record under the exceptions contained in R.C. 149.43(A) and therefore not a public record. We disagree. R.C. 149.43 provides in part:
“(A) As used in this section:
“(1) ‘Public record’ means any record that is kept by any public office, including * * * [a] city * * * except * * * trial preparation records * * *. <<* * *
“(4) ‘Trial preparation record’ means any record that contains information that is specifically compiled in reasonable anticipation of, or in defense of, a civil or criminal action…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Celebrezze v. Ohio Fifth District Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by24 opinions
- James G. Jackson v. City of Columbus, Gregory Lashutka, Thomas W. Rice, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Bush v. SpurlockOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Mazzaro v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State, Ex Rel. Zauderer v. JosephOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.