Legal Opinion
Peterson v. City of Inver Grove Heights
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 1984No. C4-83-1408PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal by the City of Inver Grove Heights (“City”) from the order of the district court, dated March 29, 1983. The order reduced the amount the Peterson property had been assessed for construction of a new public road known as Ann Marie Trail. The City appeals the district court’s assertion of jurisdiction as well as the determinations that the assessment exceeded the benefits conferred and violated the uniformity clause of the Minnesota Constitution.
We reverse.
FACTS
On August 22, 1963, respondent Marion Peterson and her late husband purchased 6.2 acres of land…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of BurnsvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- City of Chisago City v. PoulterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Gibbish v. Village of BurnsvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Habel v. City of Chisago CityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- DRB 24, LLC v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Countryside Village v. City of North BranchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Countryside Village v. City of North BranchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988