Legal Opinion

State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1975No. 45032PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, is a bonding company authorized to write surety bonds within the State of Minnesota. Such bonds include those required of retail dealers of intoxicating liquors under Minn. St. 340.12.

In 1969 Royal Court, Inc., obtained a license to sell intoxicating liquors in St. Louis Park on both an “on sale” and “off sale” basis. In November of 1969, Royal Court, Inc., obtained the statutory “off sale” and “on sale” liquor license bonds required by Minn. St. 340.12 from defendant. Both bonds name the city of St. Louis Park as the obligee as required…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schaeffer v. NewberrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pfeiffer v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Appeal of KenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Boelter v. City of Coon RapidsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  4. Peterson v. City of Inver Grove HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Minneapolis Auto Auction, Ltd. v. Spicer Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API