Legal Opinion

Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of Burnsville

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 13, 1976No. 45468, 45632PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Yetka, Justice.

These are appeals, one from the judgment of the District Court of Dakota County vacating a special assessment levied by the Village (now City) of Burnsville on the subject property, and one from an order denying Burnsville’s motion for a new trial. We reverse and remand.

The improvement which formed the basis of the assessment is Sewer Project 70-30 of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC). This project is an interceptor sewer designed to carry all of Burnsville’s sewage out of Burnsville to a new treatment plant in Eagan Township. The $3.4 million cost of the project…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Rogers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  4. State ex rel. Stateler v. ReisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. State ex rel. Burger v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of BurnsvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  4. Independent School District 254 v. City of KenyonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Peterson v. City of Inver Grove HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API