Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of Burnsville
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Yetka, Justice.
These are appeals, one from the judgment of the District Court of Dakota County vacating a special assessment levied by the Village (now City) of Burnsville on the subject property, and one from an order denying Burnsville’s motion for a new trial. We reverse and remand.
The improvement which formed the basis of the assessment is Sewer Project 70-30 of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC). This project is an interceptor sewer designed to carry all of Burnsville’s sewage out of Burnsville to a new treatment plant in Eagan Township. The $3.4 million cost of the project…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Rogers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- State ex rel. Stateler v. ReisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State ex rel. Burger v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of BurnsvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Independent School District 254 v. City of KenyonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Peterson v. City of Inver Grove HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.