Legal Opinion
Habel v. City of Chisago City
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 10, 1984No. C3-83-1674PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the Chisago County District Court dismissing the property owners’ appeal to that court from the city’s special assessment allocating the cost of a street and utility improvement. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 10, 1982, at a regular meeting of its City Council, the City of Chisago City scheduled a hearing to be held regarding the assessment of a frontage road and utility improvements. The hearing was scheduled pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 429.-061, subd. 1 (1982). The assessments were calculated by the city clerk and engineer, with the aid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Appeal of Ewert v. City of WinthropSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Wessen v. Village of DeephavenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- City of Chisago City v. PoulterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Peterson v. City of Inver Grove HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Sievert v. City of LakefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nasca v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Curiskis v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Shortridge v. DaubneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Shortridge v. DaubneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Shortridge v. DaubneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987