Legal Opinion

Gibbish v. Village of Burnsville

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 25, 1972No. 43109PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Todd, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a judgment setting aside a water assessment and a sewer assessment against separate parcels of plaintiffs’ property. The evidence in this case requires that we reverse.

Plaintiffs owned two parcels of real estate located in the village of Burnsville against which assessments for water and sewer improvements were made.

Parcel 255A2al (hereinafter 255A) consists of about 17.3 acres located on the north side of Trunk Highway No. 13 in the village of Burnsville. A Northern States Power Company easement runs diagonally across the northerly portion of the property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. City of St. Louis Park v. EngellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. E. H. Willmus Properties, Inc. v. Village of New BrightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Qvale v. City of WillmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Nyquist v. Town Center, Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Peterson v. City of Inver Grove HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Nelson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API