Legal Opinion
McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 17, 2015No. A14-1992,A15-64PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
In this special-assessment dispute, appellant city argues that the district court erred by concluding that (a) Minn.Stat. §§ 429.061, .081, do not require a written objection in order to appeal a special assessment to the district court; and (b) even if a written objection is required under' the applicable statutes, respondent landowner did not forfeit the right to appeal because respondent substantially complied with the written objection requirement. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondent McCullough and Sons, Inc., is a Minnesota corporation that owns real property in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights, A14-1992Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- DRB 24, LLC, on behalf of itself and other similarly situated property owners in Minneapolis that have been assessed vacant building registration fees in 2013 v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016