Legal Opinion
Hoyt v. American Traders, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 1986No. TC 84-1701-NJ-2, CA A33635 and SC S32398PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, C. J.
The question is whether the filing of a petition for dissolution that contains the description of real property owned by the parties as tenants by the entirety gives lis pendens notice, under ORS 93.740, to subsequent purchasers and incumbrancers, thus creating priority of interest. The answer involves the application of the lis pendens statute, ORS 93.740 and the dissolution statutes, ORS 107.105 and 107.115.
The plaintiff (whom we shall call the wife) filed a petition for dissolution of the marriage and requested that the real property at issue, which was specifically described in her…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cook v. MozerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- Siebert v. SiebertOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Houston v. TimmermanOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Ganoe v. OhmartOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Walker v. GoldsmithOregon Supreme Court · 1886
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Miller v. CC Meisel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- In Re: Rudie William Pletz, Debtor. Rudie William Pletz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Oregon Account Systems, Inc. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Doughty v. BirkholtzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Vukanovich v. KineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.