Vukanovich v. Kine
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.
This appeal involves a dispute over the validity of a “notice of pendency of an action” recorded under ORS 93.740, also called a “notice of lis pendens.” Plaintiff recorded the challenged notice of lis pendens after he sued defendants Kine and Stonecrest Properties, LLC, (Stonecrest) alleging that they had breached an agreement that called for Kine and plaintiff to invest in a limited liability company that would, in turn, purchase certain real property. As a remedy for the alleged breach, plaintiff claimed entitlement to damages or, as an alternative, specific performance of the agreement.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Houston v. TimmermanOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Miller v. CC Meisel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Hoyt v. American Traders, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Doughty v. BirkholtzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Pedro v. KippCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Indian Ridge I, LLC v. LenahanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Vukanovich v. KineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Perkett v. BurrowsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Calaveras II, LLC v. Eastside Bend, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- Christensen v. GalliwayDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.