Legal Opinion
Ganoe v. Ohmart
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1927PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
That land conveyed to husband and wife by one instrument constitutes them tenants by the entirety, unless the conveyance manifests a different intention, has become the settled law of this state. This is a rule of property not to be changed, except by the legislative department of the state: Dodd v. First National Bank of Eugene, 117 Or. 691 (245 Pac. 504); Twigger v. Twigger, 110 Or. 520, 534 (223 Pac. 934); Stout v. Van Zante, 109 Or. 430 (219 Pac. 804, 220 Pac. 414); Chase v. McKenzie, 81 Or. 429, 433 (159 Pac. 1025). This rule was first announced in Noblitt v. Beebe, 23 Or. 4 (35 Pac.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Otto F. Stifel's Union Brewing Co. v. SaxySupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Chandler v. CheneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Pray v. StebbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Vasilion v. VasilionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Licker v. GluskinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Fairclaw v. ForrestCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- TERRY AND COMPANY v. HensenWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.