Legal Opinion

Walker v. Goldsmith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1886PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Multnomah Countt. Defendants Goldsmith appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.

The plaintiff brings this suit to obtain partition of the east half of the Danforth-Balch Donation Land Claim, situate in Multnomah county, Oregon. Pie alleges that he is the owner of 11,335-100,000 of said claim; that Louis Goldsmith is the owner of one-fourth ; that Max Goldsmith is the owner of one-fourth ; that L. W. Gilliland is the owner of 17,067-100,000; that Seneca Smith is the owner of 9,588-100,000, and that Anna Plamilton and Emma Dickinson each own one-twentieth.

The defendants Louis Goldsmith and Max Goldsmith answered together, denying the material allegations of the complaint,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Murray v. BallouNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. Miller v. SherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Mohr v. ManierreSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Leitch v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Center v. P. & M. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Brady v. GebbieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Brady v. GebbieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Bridger v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Singo v. McGheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API