Legal Opinion

Doughty v. Birkholtz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 1998No. 96-0487-E-1; CA A97973PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

In this case, plaintiffs sought to set aside a transfer of real property allegedly made to defraud a creditor and to establish the priority of interests in that real property. Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s order granting defendants’ summary judgment motion and from the court’s award of costs to defendants. In granting summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the property transfer was not fraudulent as a matter of law and that a notice of lis pendens recorded by plaintiffs, based on a claim filed before the Construction Contractors Board (board), was a nullity. We affirm the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. To v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hoyt v. American Traders, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Stadelman v. Builders BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pollock v. DR Horton, Inc.-PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Vukanovich v. KineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Indian Ridge I, LLC v. LenahanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Rapid Displays Inc. v. GorderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Barnett v. Redmond School District 2JCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API