Oregon Account Systems, Inc. v. Greer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*740WOLLHEIM, J.
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing plaintiff’s action on the ground that his complaint failed to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), ORS 95.230. ORCP 21A(8). Assuming the truth of plaintiffs well-pleaded allegations and facts that might be adduced as proof of such allegations, we consider whether the pleadings are legally sufficient to state a claim. Brennen v. City of Eugene, 285 Or 401, 405, 591 P2d 719 (1979). We reverse and remand.
On October 23,1993, Floyd Greer conveyed by statutory…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Telephone Equipment Network, Inc. v. Ta/Westchase Place, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. RadeckiNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Webster Industries, Inc. v. Northwood Doors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
- Perkey v. Portes-JorolAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Preferred Funding, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.