Legal Opinion

Oregon Account Systems, Inc. v. Greer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 2000No. 9710-07924; CA A100894PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*740WOLLHEIM, J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing plaintiff’s action on the ground that his complaint failed to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), ORS 95.230. ORCP 21A(8). Assuming the truth of plaintiffs well-pleaded allegations and facts that might be adduced as proof of such allegations, we consider whether the pleadings are legally sufficient to state a claim. Brennen v. City of Eugene, 285 Or 401, 405, 591 P2d 719 (1979). We reverse and remand.

On October 23,1993, Floyd Greer conveyed by statutory…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Telephone Equipment Network, Inc. v. Ta/Westchase Place, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. RadeckiNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Webster Industries, Inc. v. Northwood Doors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
  4. Perkey v. Portes-JorolAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. Preferred Funding, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API