Legal Opinion
Skroopka v. Royal Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 1955No. Civ. A. 8690PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Action upon an insurance policy insuring against loss resulting from accidental bodily injury and sickness, wherein plaintiff recovered judgment, from which defendant appeals.
The policy sued upon became effective September 19, 1952, and insures plaintiff and his wife “against loss resulting from ... sickness which is contracted while this Policy is in force but after this Policy has been maintained in force for not less than (30) days.” It further provides that “If such injury or sickness shall require treatment... by a legally qualified physician or surgeon, the Company will pay to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- First National Bank v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Brickell v. Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Brubaker v. Beneficial Standard Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Reiser v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Fohl v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mogil v. California Physicians Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Bower v. Roy-Al Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Kirchstein v. Kentucky Central Life Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990