Legal Opinion
Fohl v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 11, 1942No. Civ. 13221PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
J. — This action was instituted by Charles E. Fohl, guardian of the person and estate of William E. Fohl, an incompetent, to recover total and permanent disability benefits under a limited payment life policy and under a group policy of insurance, both issued by defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company upon the life of said incompetent. In addition thereto, the plaintiff guardian seeks to recover damages allegedly resulting to him personally by reason of the cancellation of the group policy.
Trial before the court sitting without a jury resulted in a judgment for defendant insurance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cohen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Wilkinson v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. of DetroitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Reiser v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. JemisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Mutual Hospital Insurance, Inc. v. KlapperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- National Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.