Legal Opinion
Bower v. Roy-Al Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 21, 1973No. Civ. 42262PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This matter comes to the court on certification from the appellate department of the superior court pursuant to rule 63(a), (b) and (c), California Rules of Court.
The “Engrossed Settled Statement on Appeal” reveals that plaintiff Jewell Bower brought suit against defendant Roy-Al Corporation, individually and doing business as Contract Insurance Underwriters of Seaboard Life Insurance Company of America, to recover on a credit life and disability policy issued by defendant.
The case was tried without a jury and taken under submission by the court. On June 16, 1972, judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Cohen v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Reiser v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Lovett v. American Family Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lunardi v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Mogil v. California Physicians Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990