First National Bank v. Maryland Casualty Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. George PI. Hutton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action is brought to recover the sum of twenty thousand dollars on four burglary insurance polices of five thousand dollars each known as the “Peerless Bank Burglary Policy,” issued in favor of the plaintiff and under which defendant agreed to indemnify the plaintiff from loss by burglary accomplished through entry into the bank safe of plaintiff “by the use of tools or explosives directly thereupon.” In the complaint four causes of action against the defendant are stated, each counting on one of the policies issued. Each policy had attached to it a schedule showing the location and…
2Cited by29 opinions
- Miller Bros. Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Ogburn v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Komroff v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Martin v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.