Brickell v. Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The object of this action is to recover the sum of $5,000 on a policy of insurance for the loss by fire of a two-story frame building, situated in the city of San Francisco, said building, it is alleged, being the property of plaintiff.
The court sustained the defendant’s demurrer to the amended complaint, and the plaintiff declining to further amend the same, judgment was entered dismissing the action.
From said judgment this appeal is taken.
According to the averments of the complaint, the respondent, on the twentieth day of September, 1905, issued to the appellant a policy of fire insurance…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wm. Skinner & Sons' Ship-Building & Dry-Dock Co. v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Schlesinger v. . GilhoolyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Smith v. Phœnix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Menzel v. PrimmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Vancouver Nat. Bank v. Law Union & Crown Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. GidneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Lawler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Protex-A-Kar Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Lane Mortgage Co. v. CrenshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.