Bond v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Knox Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, C. J.
Upon each side of, and upon the line of its right of way, which extends north and south through appellant’s farm, the appellee has maintained fences, except a space in front of appellant’s house on, the east side of the track. In front of the house is a piece of ground seventy-five feet square, outside of the right of way proper, on all sides of which, except that on the line of appellee’s right of way, there are and have been secure fences. Appellant has owned the farm for seventeen years. He built and has maintained the fences around the above named piece of ground since he has owned the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- President of the Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. PettyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. ShimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Bellefontaine Railway Co. v. SumanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hunt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Wabash Railway Co. v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. MosierIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. BurganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. GoodbarIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.