Legal Opinion

President of the Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1861PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from the Putnam Common Pleas. ■

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Smith sued the Terre Hcmte and Richmond Railroad Oo., under the statute, for the value of a horse killed upon the track of her road, by a locomotive.

*103The defendant answered, that on the-day of-, 1851, the plaintiff owned a tract of land, upon which he then resided, and still resides; that the defendant located her road across said track, and appropriated a strip of it one hundred feet wide; that to settle the amount of damage for so doing, the company and Smith referred the matter to the arbitrament of jReuben Hagan, and two others, who awarded to Smith, $500; $200 of which were for the land…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lafayette Plankroad Co. v. New Albany & Salem RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. TownsendIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. New Albany & Salem Railroad v. MaidenIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. WeightIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. PettyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. MosierIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API