Legal Opinion

Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. Thomas

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9966PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Howard Circuit .Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The controlling question in this case is, whether a railroad company is bound to fence its track at a point where a private right of way leading from an adjacent public highway crosses it. The evidence shows that a public highway ran parallel with the appellant’s track, and that from it a private way extended across the track and through the farm of James H. Martin. The contention of the appellant is, that it was not bound to securely fence this way, but had fully performed its duty by providing suitable cattle-guards, and properly placing them on the sides of the private way.

Our statute is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. R. v. CollingwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. President of the Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. ChristyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. ShimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. McKeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Kempf v. HimselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Hunt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Lillstrom v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API