Hunt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the LaPorte Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, C. J.
The material facts in the case, as stated in the pleadings, and found specially by the court below, are these: More than twenty years before the cause of action, as relied upon by appellant, accrued, the appellee railway company, by appropriate condemnation and appropriation proceedings, under the statute then in force, acquired a right of way through the lands then and now owned by B. C. Bowell, and constructed its railway thereon. On the lands of Bowell there is a farm crossing-and two gates, which were constructed by the railway company about twenty years ago for his use and convenience,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Middleton v. GreesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. WhiteneckIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Wabash Railway Co. v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. Ohio Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.