Legal Opinion

Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. Burgan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1894No. 709PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

The appellee brought this action against the appellant, to recover damages for stock injured on appellant’s railroad. The complaint is in two paragraphs, but inasmuch as the appellee failed to make any proof to sustain the first paragraph, it will not be noticed in the further consideration of the record.

The second paragraph reads as follows:

“The plaintiff, Elmer Burgan, alleges that on November 9, 1890, John A. Pierco was the owner of the north half of the southeast quarter of section thirty-two (32), township twenty-four (24) north, range five (5) east, in Howard county, Indiana, and said…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hunt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Williams v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Bond v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Indiana Trust Co. v. ByramIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Beck & Pauli Lithographing Co. v. Evansville Brewing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. PowerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Thomas v. TroxelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. GriffinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API