Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Goodbar

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1885No. 11,972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This action1 was instituted in the circuit court by the appellee to recover the value of fifteen sheep killed by a locomotive of the appellant.

There was no demurrer to the complaint, and the question for consideration is, whether it is sufficient upon objection made after verdict?

The only averment upon the subject of the failure to fence is this: “And at the point where said sheep were so injured and killed as aforesaid, said railroad was not securely fenced in, and such fence properly maintained by the defendant as required by law.” Had a demurrer been addressed to the *597complaint it would…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad v. HerboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Indianapolis, Pittsburgh, & Cleveland Railroad v. PettyIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. KreigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. MosierIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Wabash Railway Co. v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Major v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. EtzlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. MosierIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API