Bellefontaine Railway Co. v. Suman
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, C. J.
The errors complained of are: 1. That a demurrer to the complaint was overruled. 2. That a demurrer to the answer was sustained.
The complaint was to recover for sheep of the plaintiff, killed by the defendant’s cars. It was averred that “ at the time of the killing of said sheep said railway was not securely fenced in, and said fence properly maintained by said company.” It is argued that it does not appear from this averment that the railway was not securely fenced at the place where the animals entered upon it. It is not to be questioned that the complaint would be true, though the railroad…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Lafayette & Indianapolis Railroad v. ShrinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- President of the Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. ShimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hunt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad v. HerboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Bond v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Toledo, Wabash & Western R. W. Co. v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.