Legal Opinion

People v. Pittam

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 30, 1995No. 94SA91PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the findings of a hearing board that the respondent 1 violated the Code of Professional Responsibility, and also the board’s recommendation that the respondent be suspended for two years and be assessed the costs of the proceeding. The respondent has excepted to the panel’s action, primarily on the ground that the recommended discipline is too severe. We generally accept the findings of the board and panel, but modify the period of suspension to one year and one day.

I

The parties submitted an unconditional stipulation of facts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RobnettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. MargolinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. People v. PittamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re FischerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Dudding v. Norton Frickey & AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. People v. SilvolaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. BradySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API