Legal Opinion

People v. Silvola

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1996No. 96SA41PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be suspended for one year and one day, with special conditions for reinstatement. Neither the respondent nor the assistant disciplinary counsel has excepted to the panel’s recommendations. We accept the hearing panel’s recommendations and order that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day with certain conditions for reinstatement.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1984. Because the respondent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. PittamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. BradleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. JaramilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. AinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. People v. ElliottSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. People v. SegalSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. People v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API