Legal Opinion

People v. Pittam

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 26, 1977No. 27777PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lee

Charges of unethical conduct were lodged with the Supreme Court Grievance Committee against respondent, Richard O. Pittam, who was admitted to practice law on October 3, 1969.

The formal complaint against respondent evolved from his association in the practice of law in a three-lawyer partnership, and concerned respondent’s alleged failure to account to the partnership for partnership attorney fees in excess of $4,200 which he received and which were appropriated by him in violation of his partnership obligation.

A formal hearing was held by the Grievance Committee, at the conclusion of which…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, KerstingArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Matter of LowtherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  3. People v. PittamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. KluverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. People v. PittamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API