Legal Opinion

Dudding v. Norton Frickey & Associates

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 10, 2000No. 99SC403PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

This case concerns the interrelationship between a contingency fee agreement and an attorney's request for quantum meruit recovery. Richard Dudding (Dudding) hired Norton Frickey & Associates (Frickey) to litigate a wrongful termination of employment claim on his behalf. Dudding and Frickey entered into a contingency fee agreement setting out the conditions of payment for Frickey's services. - Ultimately, Dudding terminated Frickey's services and Frickey filed an attorneys' lien against the proceeds of Dudding's wrongful termination lawsuit, and also sought in a separate proceeding to compel…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Rhoades v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Cohen v. Grainger, Tesoriero & BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. DCB Construction Co. v. Central City Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Berra v. SPRINGER AND STEINBERG, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. Mogavero v. SilversteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Interbank Investments, LLC v. Eagle River Water & Sanitation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Harvey Barnett, Inc. v. ShidlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API