Dudding v. Norton Frickey & Associates
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis
This case concerns the interrelationship between a contingency fee agreement and an attorney's request for quantum meruit recovery. Richard Dudding (Dudding) hired Norton Frickey & Associates (Frickey) to litigate a wrongful termination of employment claim on his behalf. Dudding and Frickey entered into a contingency fee agreement setting out the conditions of payment for Frickey's services. - Ultimately, Dudding terminated Frickey's services and Frickey filed an attorneys' lien against the proceeds of Dudding's wrongful termination lawsuit, and also sought in a separate proceeding to compel…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Rhoades v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Cohen v. Grainger, Tesoriero & BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- DCB Construction Co. v. Central City Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Berra v. SPRINGER AND STEINBERG, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Mogavero v. SilversteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Interbank Investments, LLC v. Eagle River Water & Sanitation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Harvey Barnett, Inc. v. ShidlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.