Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Schaefer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1988No. C1-86-2045PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent James H. Schaefer in December 1986. Subsequently, in June 1987, the director filed a supplemental petition. Respondent filed an answer denying the allegations of the first petition, but did not answer the second petition. Therefore, the allegations in the supplemental petition are to be deemed admitted pursuant to R.Law.Prof. Resp. 13(c).

On October 7, 1987, the matter came on for hearing before a referee appointed by this court. Respondent appeared at the hearing pro…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Matter of Discipline of FlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST McCOYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LevensteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KleinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API