Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Graham

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1993No. CX-92-948PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent Timothy E. Graham is before this court on an amended and supplementary petition for disciplinary action filed by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility on July 21, 1992. 1 The amended petition alleges that respondent has (1) fabricated documents and given false testimony; (2) engaged in a pattern of submitting false evidence and fabricated documents; (3) failed to file federal income tax returns; (4) engaged in a pattern of conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice; and (5) failed to cooperate in the disciplinary proceeding. Referee Arthur J.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of BunkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Matter of Discipline of JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Matter of Discipline of CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SchaeferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Petition for Discipl. Act. Against WeemsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against MoellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against MargolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RuttgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API