Legal Opinion

Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 2009No. S161385PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J. — Citigroup, Inc., offered a voluntary employee incentive compensation plan that provides employees with shares of restricted company stock at a reduced price in lieu of a portion of that employee’s annual cash compensation. Employees agree that, should they resign or be terminated for cause before their restricted shares of stock vest, they would forfeit the stock and the portion of cash compensation they directed be paid in the form of the restricted stock. We consider here whether the incentive plan’s forfeiture provision violates Labor Code sections 201, 202, and 219,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Barner v. LeedsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Binder v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Serafin v. Balco Properties Ltd., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Voris v. LampertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Singh v. Southland Stone, U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Faine Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Price v. Starbucks Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2011

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API