Legal Opinion
Price v. Starbucks Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 20, 2011No. B219501PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
Plaintiff and appellant Drake Price worked at Starbucks as an entry-level barista for approximately 13 scheduled shifts before he was fired. He sued Starbucks Corporation (Starbucks) on behalf of himself and a putative class, seeking to recover unpaid wages, penalties, and damages, alleging Labor Code violations, including failure to timely pay wages upon termination, failure to pay an additional hour of reporting time pay on the day he was fired, and failure to issue a wage statement that complied with the Labor Code. Starbucks challenged the pleadings, and the trial court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Quiroz v. Seventh Avenue CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Hilary Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Roderick Magadia v. Wal-Mart AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Aleman v. Airtouch CellularCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Alonzo v. Maximus, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.