Legal Opinion

Barner v. Leeds

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2000No. S070377PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

In Wiley v. County of San Diego (1998) 19 Cal.4th 532 [79 Cal.Rptr.2d 672, 966 P.2d 983], we held that in a legal malpractice action against an attorney for alleged negligence in representing the plaintiff (the accused in a criminal action), the plaintiff must establish, as a necessary element of the malpractice cause of action, that he or she is actually innocent of the offense charged in the underlying criminal proceeding. Our holding in Wiley applies to legal malpractice claims asserted against both private attorneys and public defenders, and in that case we were not…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. AE Ex Rel. Hernandez v. County of TulareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. James Steinle v. City and County of S.F.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Martinez v. MaruszczakNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Liberal v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API