Faine Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief District Judge:
Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011), 1 Appellant Nord-strom, Inc. (“Nordstrom”) made revisions to the employee arbitration policy 2 contained in its employee handbook. These changes precluded employees from bringing most class action lawsuits. Despite these changes, weeks later, Nordstrom employee Fame Davis filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of herself and other similarly situated employees, alleging that Nordstrom violated various state and federal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- William Joseph Quinn v. Glen Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- James L. Ticknor Janet Ticknor Larry Ticknor Tickco Holding, L.L.C. Ticknor Lodging Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Norcia v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Aaron Senne v. Kansas City Royals BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Planned Parenthood of Greater v. UshhsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Jorge Alberto NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Shannon Zoller v. Gca Advisors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.