Legal Opinion

Smith v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2006No. S129476PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Section 201 of the Labor Code 1 provides that if an employer “discharges” an employee, wages earned and unpaid at the time of discharge are due and payable immediately. Under section 203, an employer’s willful failure to pay wages to a “discharged” employee in accordance with section 201 subjects the employer to penalties.

The question presented is whether the discharge element of these two statutes requires an involuntary termination from an ongoing employment relationship, such as when an employer fires an employee, or whether this element also may be met when an employer…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Pineda v. Bank of America, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  3. City of San Jose v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Ashlee R.California Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Voris v. LampertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API