Legal Opinion
Brill v. Fox
California Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 12426PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from an order denying the motion of defendants Wallace I. Fox and Haddie Fox, made under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to vacate and set aside a default judgment entered against them in an action to foreclose a mortgage.
The record shows that the foreclosure action was commenced January 21, 1930; that a copy of the complaint attached to an undated summons was served on these two defendants, in the county in which the action was commenced, on January 24, 1930; that their default was entered on February 8, 1930; that judgment was entered on February 17,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Waite v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Jergins v. SchenckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Mitchell v. Cal. & Or. Coast S.S. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Toon v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- R. Michael Butner v. Ingrid NeustadterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.